Sunday, August 15, 2004

Seems track 11, Top of the World, is getting read errors on my disc.  I’m going to need to borrow one from a friend to rip that track.  Anyway, the ripping continues this morning.

Currently ripping: The Essentials - Ratt

Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:37:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

I thought I was going to bed, but did some blog reading and ripped some more CDs in the process:

·         For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge by Van Halen

·         Best Of Volume I by Van Halen

·         The Long Road by Nickleback

Sunday, August 15, 2004 12:40:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Tonight’s ripping session brings the following CDs over into VBR MP3s using EAC/LAME:

·         Cracked Rear View by Hootie & The Blowfish

·         More Than You Think You Are by Matchbox Twenty

·         Seal by Seal

·         Seal IV by Seal

·         Marching to Mars by Sammy Hagar

·         Red Voodoo by Sammy Hagar and The Waboritas

·         Flying In a Blue Dream by Joe Satriani

·         Just Push Play by Aerosmith

·         Balance by Van Halen

·         Silver Side Up by Nickleback

·         Vault by Def Leppard

·         The Way I Am by Jennifer Knapp

·         Dirt by Alice In Chains

·         Weathered by Creed

·         Voyage to India by India.Arie

·         Promised Land by Queensryche

·         Greatest Hits by Queensryche

[Remember the good ole’ days, back before the record companies came crashing down on folks with good ideas?  I loved being able to buy a CD from mp3.com and immediately getting the ripped content.  It was instant gratification and I got to own the hardcopy.  Oh well.  Back to ripping with EAC and LAME.]

Sunday, August 15, 2004 12:29:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, August 14, 2004

Well, there’s some trouble in paradise … I ripped some Queensryche the other day with the Cybermedia MP3 encoder and Windows Media Player 9.  When listening to the tracks later that day on my iPod, a good number of them were truncated by 10-20 seconds!  When I got home, I fired up the original MP3s stored on my PC and they played fine.  Windows Media Player also played the MP3s directly off the iPod fine, too.  A little digging in Google and I discover that there are some encoders that create variable bitrate MP3s that the iPod just doesn’t like.

Apparently there is a thing called a null frame at the front of a VBR MP3 that contains information about the timing of the track.  If this frame isn’t there, then players have to estimate the duration of the song based upon the size of the file itself – a suboptimum decision when you’re dealing with variable encoding, and the iPod seems to suffer from this problem.

Some more digging turned me on to a solution, VbrFix, that “corrects” your MP3s.  The program works as advertised even if it’s a tad clunky. However, even more digging turned me on to Exact Audio Copy (EAC) and the LAME MP3 encoder through The Quintessential Guide to Creating High Quality MP3s by Chris Myden, which I highly suggest you go read.  I did a quick test to encode my Queensryche disc with EAC and LAME and the audio quality was noticeably better!  As a result, I’m ripping a bunch of CDs tonight in that combination to listen to them in comparison to the existing MP3s.  I bet as a result that I’m going to go back and revisit my entire ripped collection and do it again (as painful as that may sound) with EAC and LAME.  Why?  Because my buddy Scott mentioned that his MP3s don’t sound as “bright” as the original CD and I had to agree.  My MP3s sounded somewhat muddied.  However, the EAC/LAME combination sounded amazing and I want the high quality audio.

Why does EAC/LAME appear to do a better job than Windows Media Player and Cybermedia?  My understanding from reading the guide above is that the reader and encoder are both very important in the process of ripping CDs.  EAC/LAME just appears to do a better job than Windows Media Player, which means its time for an e-mail to the Windows Media Player team and ask them what’s going on.

Saturday, August 14, 2004 10:31:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Sunday, August 08, 2004

Yet another beautiful Sunday!  This summer has simply been amazing in terms of weather … not too hot, though often times cool.  I don’t think I’d have it any other way!

Today was a major cleaning for the Nano Cube.  I had neglected it for far too long, and algae had built up all over the glass and the sand was due for a good vacuuming.  I can gladly report the scum is gone from the top of the water and the tank once again sparkles.  I put in a new phosphate sponge and introduce some new blue-legged hermit crabs and some more turbo snails.   Hopefully this new crew will get to cleaning and help out overall, as the last crew succumbed to some unknown force of nature.

The MP3 ripping?  It continues.  I think I’ve completed another 25 or so today.  Just throwin’ ‘em in and lettin’ ‘em copy.  The only down side is when I come across a disk that isn’t in AMG’s database and have to hand-enter the obscure stuff.

 

Sunday, August 08, 2004 5:33:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Tuesday, August 03, 2004

I’m taking advantage of the fact that that the iPod is really a 40GB hard drive connected via USB 2.0 to play back music using Windows Media Player 9.  In doing this, I get full fidelity in WMP including things like album art, ratings, frequently played tracks, automatic playlist generation, etc.

To make it work, I deleted all of the entries from my existing media library and then imported all of the music that is sitting on the iPod.  However, note that it’s necessary to remove the Hidden bits from \iPod_Control\Music\F00-F49 folders, as Windows Media Player refuses to search hidden directories.

I now have a notebook hard drive that is free from music – thereby returning over 15GB of space to me! – yet still have the exact same experience as I had before in Windows Media Player.  Nice.  The only thing I would like now is for synchronization between ratings and play counts on the iPod with Windows Media Player.  That would be cool.

Tuesday, August 03, 2004 10:43:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, July 31, 2004

Let me just say it’s hard to stay motivated to rip CDs when you’re down to the “junk.”  By junk, I don’t mean that I don’t appreciate the music, but its stuff that I just normally wouldn’t listen to.  I’ve done all the stuff that I would listen to and now I’m looking at the remaining discs with apathy. Yet to complete the project of packing away all our CDs, it must be done.  I did a size check last night and am estimating that once everything is ripped, it will take up less than 20GB.  Nice.

Saturday, July 31, 2004 10:09:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, July 30, 2004

With this post, I hit a whooping 10 for the month of July J  I’m trying to disprove Dan’s theory that I only do something with zealousness while it is “new.” 

Friday, July 30, 2004 2:33:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Thursday, July 29, 2004

I just drove about 800 miles over the course of two-and-a-half days and brought my iPod in tow.  Unfortunately, I don’t yet have the “iPod your BMW” part installed, so I used the Monster iCarPlay Wireless - FM Transmitter instead.  The overall experience was pretty good – static would only be introduced if the station you were tuned to was also broadcasting locally, and it seemed that as you drove different locations did have local stations broadcasting, forcing you to switch channels.  Once the part is in and installed, this will be a thing of the past.

Having 2,208 songs on the iPod and putting into shuffle play is quite a fun experience – though you can do this with any digital audio player out there.  But just letting it cycle through music randomly was a great way to gain exposure to lots of different styles and types of music that I wouldn’t normally listen to.

My next step is to get into playlists and begin organizing music the way I want to listen to it rather than always listening “by album.”

Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:05:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Wednesday, July 28, 2004

I’m actively ripping my CD collection to MP3 using CyberLink’s MP3 encoder for Windows Media Player.  I had ripped about 100 CDs at a fixed 192 bit rate and then discovered that the CyberLink encoder supports variable bit rate.  The size difference is significant, with the variable bit rate files being smaller than their fixed rate counterparts.  I was a big variable bit rate fan for Windows Media, so I’ll give the MP3 version a shot for a while.  If I don’t notice any audio quality problems, I may go back and redo the 100 CDs I already did in order to save on space.  The down side is encoding of the variable bit rate files takes noticable longer than fixed rate files.

Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:56:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Saturday, July 24, 2004

I spent the day cleaning up the basement with Angelique … we’re getting ready to redo the basement and the first step is to get rid of all the crap.  At the same time, I was pulling the CD collection to MP3 and am up to 10GB with about 1/3 of the CDs converted.  We’re really enjoying the Creative Wireless Music device as it’s reinvigorated our interest in music because now the stuff we like is accessible and easy to find. 

Saturday, July 24, 2004 7:56:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

Yesterday I broke down and bought an iPod.  One of the new 40GB models with the Click Wheel.  This was a very tough decision for me to make, as I work for Microsoft and I inherently want to support the company as much as possible – especially knowing some of the very cool stuff that is coming in the near term.

What drove me to the iPod?  Well, there were a couple of factors that played into my decision:

1.      I wanted a device big enough to hold my entire music collection; my wife and I are tired of the eye sore that is our collection of CDs, so I’m making a concerted effort to move all of that music over to the PC

 

2.      I wanted a device that I could use in the car; this – more than any other factor – is the reason why I bought the iPod.  Yeah, I know you can use FM transmitters or the line in on a lot of car stereos to enable any media player to work with a car, but I want tight integration with the car’s stero controls.  Since I own a 2004 BMW 325i, the whole “iPod Your BMW” pulled me in.  I considered PhatNoise – and with their support for Windows Media 9, it is a very tempting offer – but in the end it is $400-$500 more expensive for PhatNoise and it’s not very portable.

 

3.      I wanted a device that was stylish and felt like it was well engineered; Apple has a unique knack for making nice devices with better feeling quality for a premium price; most WMA-based players, on the other hand, provide commodity pricing and commodity feel.  Personally, I believe this is about to change – especially with the introduction of Creative’s Zen Touch

 

4.      I wanted it and I wanted it now; I’m an instant gratification kind of guy and, once I get a bug for something – a media player, in this case – I begin to argue very hard why I shouldn’t knowing all the time I will, so I’ve just started giving myself over rather than wasting time and energy worrying about the “right” decision

Through all of this, I’m taking some crap from my Microsoft friends.  Dan and Rob, in particular right now.  Rob had the excellent idea of working with Creative to come up with a similar, more widespread solution for connecting the likes of the Zen Touch to any car stereo, similar to what PhatNoise does.  I think I’ll take him up on that idea and reach out to Creative.  I’ll blog a bit more about the experience in another post.

Saturday, July 24, 2004 9:03:00 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
 Friday, July 23, 2004

Well, truthfully they really don’t.  However, tonight my wife bought a new Eddie Bauer diaper bag.  It’s pretty nice, actually.

When I arrived home – amidst playing with the kids, putting away my bags and generally settling in (you know, those 5 minutes when you walk through the door and everything hits you at once?) – my wife tells me she bought a new diaper bag.  “Oh, great honey,” I replied.  [Note: I only read the first chapter of “Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus.”  In it, I learned women don’t want you to fix their problems, they just want you to listen.]  I assumed this would be the end of it.  She bought a bag.  I acknowledged it.  Time to move on?  Nope.

I’m informed a few short minutes later that I expressed indifference to the diaper bag.  Okay, I’m sorry – I should respect and pay homage to the diaper bag.  All hail the new diaper bag – it is, after all, a nice diaper bag.  Turns out the root cause here is that this is the first diaper bag that she picked out.  The first one we had was a kick ass Kelty Kid’s backpack/diaper bag that I picked out at Galyans.  The second one was the standard blue and yellow diaper bag that the hospital gives you with your new arrival.  So, neither were “personalized” for her – this one was.  She found it.  She liked it.  She bought it.  It’s hers.

Friday, July 23, 2004 8:58:00 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |